The purpose of this study was to see the impact of CAR, LDR, NPL, BOPO on ROA. The sample in this study was 10 banks. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical tests, classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression analysis, t-tests and coefficients of determination. Based on the results of the classical assumption test, the CAR, LDR, NPL, BOPO variables are not multicollinear, not autocorrelated, not heteroscedastic and the data is normal. The results of the study showed that the impact of CAR on ROA was negative and not significant, the impact of LDR on ROA was negative and significant, the impact of NPL was negative and significant on ROA. The impact of BOPO was positive and significant on ROA. The impact of the independent variable on the dependent variable was 70.4%, the remaining 29.6%.
Dendawijaya, L. (2013). Manajemen Perbankan. Ghalia Indonesia.
Hariyani, I. (2010). Restrukturisasi dan Penghapusan Kredit Macet. Kenapa Perbankan Memanjakan Debitur Besar Sedangkan Usaha/Debitur Kecil Dipaksa. Kompas Gramedia.
Nuresya. (2012). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank: Pendekatan Rasio NPL, LDR, BOPO dan ROA pada Bank Privat dan Publik. Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Gunadarma.
Rohimah. (2021). Analisis Pengaruh BOPO, CAR, Dan NPL Terhadap ROA Pada Bank BUMN Tahun 2012-2019 (Studi pada Bank BUMN yang Go Public di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma.
Siamat, D. (2014). Manajemen Lembaga Keuangan (4th ed.). Lembaga Penerbit FEUI.
Simorangkir. (2014). Pengantar Lembaga Keuangan Bank dan Non Bank. Ghalia Indonesia.
Sugiyono. (2018). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.